You’ll find dozens of pages, with definitions such as, ‘a way of working with horses based on the horse’s natural instincts and methods of communication’.
Most natural horsemanship proponents state that it is more natural, fair, and kind than ‘traditional’ horsemanship – which is said to involve force, bullying or intimidation to achieve goals. There are natural horsemanship instructors, trainers, and even home study programs to help people achieve advancing levels of horsemanship.
In 1998 I returned to horses after an absence. I purchased a young gelding named Raz, and was invited by a friend to watch a natural horsemanship clinic a few hours from my home. I was impressed – both by the results people achieved over the course of the clinic, and also by what the clinician was telling me about horses, how they learn, and how we can work with them. I was hooked; I bought books, and DVD’s, and purchased special equipment – ropes, halters, stiff sticks to act as an extension to my arm – all seemingly designed to enhance my communication, without fear or force.
I started taking clinics, and week-long camps. After a number of years I even did a 7 month apprenticeship with a natural horsemanship trainer. I became a handy horsewoman: I could ride my horse bareback and bridleless, at all gaits, even on the trails; I could load my horses at liberty, or from inside my truck, or from the top of a trailer; My horses would stick to me in the pasture without a halter, at a walk, trot, or canter.
I taught others natural horsemanship methods, and I helped people with problem horses. I decided to become an instructor. I tell you all of this so that you can understand my perspective in what follows: For 8 years I intensively lived, breathed, practiced, and preached natural horsemanship. And I won’t lie to you: natural horsemanship methods helped me achieve my training goals. But was there a cost?
Natural horsemanship taught me many good things that I carry with me to this day:
• to have feel, and good timing
• how to adeptly use negative reinforcement, AKA pressure and release
• to condition my body and mind to stay calm, even when the horse was not
• the importance of groundwork, and that riding horses isn’t everything there is to gain from working together
• the importance of shaping behavior – breaking a complex end goal into small steps
• it started me on the path to thinking about working with horses in ways that worked for them – more than any other instruction I had previously received, and for that I am eternally grateful
My experience in the world of natural horsemanship also led me to believe that the majority of people who are attracted to it are good people, with a genuine love for the horse. I do believe in the basic goodness of people, and those I met practicing natural horsemanship were no exception. I met wonderful people and horses, some who are friends or mentors to this day – which in many ways, makes this post very hard for me to write.
Part-way through my apprenticeship, my veterinarian husband was doing a textbook order, and asked me if there was anything in the catalog I wanted to order; ‘Equine Behaviour’, a textbook by Dr Paul McGreevy caught my eye. At this point in time, I had questions about some of the things I had been taught to do with horses, and no one in the horsemanship world could tell me ‘Why’ I needed to do it, other than to say, ‘That’s just what you do’. I hoped the book could give me answers.
I started reading.
By chapter four, ‘Learning’, I was feeling some small seeds of doubt, and confusion, about what I thought I knew about how horses learn, and the methods I had been using to train them. ‘Social Behavior’, chapter 5, shattered what I had been taught about hierarchies, social structure, and dominance. Chapter 15, ‘Miscellaneous unwanted behaviours, their causes and resolution’, had me seriously questioning how I had been addressing behavior problems.
During my 8 years practicing natural horsemanship, I had been swayed by positive-sounding descriptions about what I was told I was doing with and to the horse – but I had not learned the true facts about learning and behavior, nor the consequences of using certain approaches in training situations.
Positive language, euphemisms, and catchy phrases are used and shared to describe training methods, but they fail to objectively explain how the horse is learning.
‘Make the wrong thing hard and the right thing easy’ is a classic example. This saying can be interpreted a number of different ways, depending on who hears it, and how they decide to apply it. To one person it might mean ‘Set the training situation up so that the horse can succeed, and offer the wanted response. Ignore any unwanted responses, and reinforce the wanted response.’. To someone else, that same phrase can mean, ‘When the horse does something you don’t want him to do, make things unpleasant or difficult for him, until he stops. When he stops doing the unwanted behavior, and does the behavior you want instead, immediately stop making things unpleasant or difficult and leave him alone.’ Those two interpretations of the exact same phrase are going to have completely different ‘feels’ to the horse while he learns. If we look at both approaches objectively, the first involves reinforcing wanted behavior, the second involves punishing unwanted behavior. Unfortunately for the horse, both ways may very likely work – that’s just a fact of learning. But the second way – using punishment – can have unwanted consequences (that the trainer may not be aware of), because the phrase ‘make the wrong thing hard and the right thing easy’ doesn’t give a trainer all of the information needed to make an informed decision.
To put it very simply, all horses learn the same way:
In the above example, punishment is employed when a trainer wants an unwanted behavior (eg, not loading in a trailer) to be less likely to occur in the future. Punishment may work, but numerous studies have shown that punishment can result in unintended consequences. These consequences happen whether trainers are aware they are using punishment, or not, and some of them are listed here:
Going back to my experiences at the start of this article, although I could successfully get horses to do whatever I wanted, I didn’t understand the negative consequences of using punishment to achieve some of those goals.
Punishment happens all too frequently in horse training, and I unknowingly used punishment because I did not understand the basics of how animals learn and how we train them. I was unable to make an educated and informed decision about the consequences of my actions, because I didn’t have all of the information. I had beautiful language (eg, ‘Love, Language, and Leadership’) that led me to believe I wasn’t using punishment when ‘doing’ natural horsemanship, when in fact it was a mainstay in much of my natural horsemanship training.
This is a very serious problem with the majority of currently applied horse training – natural horsemanship included; horse trainers and riding instructors of ALL disciplines and training methods are not taught the basics of learning and behavior, and the horse is paying the price.
Part of being a good trainer is understanding the benefits or consequences an approach has in a given training situation. Without an objective and factual understanding of behavior and training, such an understanding isn’t possible.
Horse people readily accept new research and scientific information about exercise physiology, nutrition, preventative health care etc., yet they still cling fast to their out-dated beliefs and traditions about horse behavior and training – especially if it is packaged in an appealing format, or when it is presented as one of the beautiful and time-honored traditions of their historic discipline. Most horse people can knowledgeably discuss gastric ulcers, or dewormer resistance in parasites, but their eyes glaze over when you try to talk about advances in the understanding of behavior and training.
How horses learn and how we train them is a well-studied and accepted branch of science. But many horse trainers, riding instructors, clinicians, and horse owners continue to describe their training methods or traditions in descriptive, and pleasant-sounding terms that fail to correctly define what is happening. Under the guise of ‘love, language and leadership’, or following the training scale, or adhering to historic or classical horsemanship traditions, people are being instructed to use punishment, or flooding, suppress the root cause of unwanted behaviors, or even create learned helplessness – all things with negative consequences, and they aren’t even aware they are doing so.
Our understanding of learning and behavior has grown dramatically in the last century. Other animal training industries have embraced this knowledge, and are making changes to how they approach training, while still getting their desired results. It’s time for the horse world to catch up. In addition to teaching horsemanship, I am also a certified horse behavior consultant, and I am not the only person in my profession seeing serious problems with training that is thought to be kind. In the words of one of my behavior colleagues ‘It’s time to stick our heads above the parapet, and speak up about what we are seeing’.
In the dog training industry, behavior consultants and trainers are speaking up about similar problems seen with methods promoted by ‘dog whisperers’ who sell their methods as natural, kind, or based on pack theory, when in reality they instead utilize punishment, flooding, and behavior suppression. Organizations such as the American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior even have position statements on the use of punishment, and the outdated concept of dominance hierarchies to explain the social structure of animals. The information is out there, the facts are readily available; there is no longer any excuse for failing to become educated.
Although I’m an optimist, I’m also a realist, and I’ll be honest: Changing how the horse world thinks about training is not going to be easy. It’s going to be difficult, and it’s going to take time. These out-dated traditions and training practices are deeply ingrained, and have become core beliefs that people have about horses and training. Speaking from personal experience, such a radical shift in thinking can even be emotionally painful – especially when we’ve based our training philosophy around incorrect information about how horses learn and behave. Waking up to the realization that we may have caused serious problems for an animal we love hurts.
But if not us, who? If not now, when?
“When you know better, you do better’”said Maya Angelou. Let’s do better, horse world.
Lauren Fraser, CHBC offers relationship-based horse training that blends the art of horsemanship with behavioral science and the practical application of learning theory. She provides horsemanship coaching, behavioral consultations, solutions to problem behaviors, foundation training, clinics, and educational presentations.
Not believing everything you think may be one of the...
Many horse training methods claim to be kind, and in...
Clicker training horses - it uses positive reinforcement,...
Not believing everything you think may be one of the...
Fear is counter-productive to horse training.
To minimize fear, you need to learn to recognize subtle signs of arousal, and adapt your training accordingly before it escalates. Many horse people can only recognize the obvious signs of fear - flight or 'fight' behaviors, like pulling away, bolting, rearing, swinging sideways to avoid the fearful thing, balking, kicking, striking and so on.
When a horse has reached this level of fearful arousal it's really too late in the game to train anything. At this point horses aren't capable of learning the good things we want them to learn, and they can also become dangerous to handle. This usually results in people then applying more pressure, or resorting to punishment to attempt to get the task done and to try and keep themselves safe. People may also feel they need to follow through with the task otherwise the horse will 'win', but no one wins in this situation: the horse isn't learning to do the task, he's just learning to escape; the human hasn't taught the horse anything other than to fear them and the training situation.
But this is not necessary. It's just not necessary to trigger fear in order to train a horse to do ANYTHING. Triggering fear in training situations also carries a very real side-effect of worsening the fear, or having the horse start to become fearful sooner in the training process.
Thanks to The Equine Observer for the satirical commentary on this important topic. ... See MoreSee Less
Horse Wonders What he Needs to Do to Demonstrate Fear "I hate going in that trailer”, said a visibly shaken Mack. “I get all tense, my eyes are out on stalks and my poo turns to liquid but they just tell me I’m being stupid rather than scared. What more do I have to do?” A recent poll of human onlookers confirmed that Mack was indeed naughty and stupid. Spokesman, Terence Digby-Jones, said, “If he was really scared then wouldn’t he bolt or something?" Mack ruefully shook his head. “Well, hindsight is great isn’t it? But right there in the heat of the moment I’m not exactly analysing my options in a thoughtful and logical manner. I did try a rear and that scared them for a moment. But then they went back to standing at the top of the ramp with a bucket of chaff and someone else with a broom up my arse. Pegasus wept…. In the end I caved, but I will try to remember the bolting thing for next time."
2 weeks ago ·